NAAJ NextGen/Young Writer Winners - 2024

This NEW category is specifically tailored for our active members age 35 and under during the contest year. Entries in this category can be on any agricultural and food topic. Note: THREE stories are to be submitted as a single entry. Stories may be entered separately in other writing categories. 

Number of entries: 8

Judge’s comments about the competition: There were many very good entries. I think that if I were the editor or instructor receiving these pieces from these talented writers, I would be very happy. Thanks to all the entrants for a group of interesting stories and best wishes and success to all of you.

Judge: Kevin Leigh Smith is an instructor, adviser, and communication specialist for the Agricultural Communication program in the Purdue Department of Agricultural Sciences Education and Communication. He has been a communication professional for more than 25 years who draws upon his experience in writing, editing, and designing when he teaches and advises students.

 

FIRST PLACE — Lena Beck, Modern Farmer

Plastic Mulch is Problematic — and Everywhere. Can We Do Better? — 8/3/2023

The Art of Resurrecting Heirloom Watermelons — 10/18/2023

‘Waste Wool’ is a Burden for Farmers. What if it Could be a Solution Instead? — 11/6/2023

Judge’s comments: Overall, the three entries from this writer do a great job of explaining complicated topics to readers.

In “plastic mulch,” the lead is compelling and draws readers in by giving them a sense of what the mulch is and why it is important. The writer also presents a good mix of sources (human interest from the perspective of practitioners as well as experts). One thing that was slightly off is when the writer describes how Viva Farms is a nonprofit and has courses. I think that is important, but not necessarily something to cover in the lead. The actual occasion for the story (the grant) could be raised sooner.

“Heirloom watermelons” has a compelling lead and is a strong story throughout. I think it balances well and there is plenty here about what the subjects are doing. I also like that the writer provides readers with a sense of why they are doing what they do.

“Waste wool” has a solid lead and good explanation of the topic. I think there is good balance throughout.

SECOND PLACE — Gabriel Pietrorazio , Fronteras Desk/KJZZ 91.5

Why a new Indigenous cookbook on Southwest plant-based cuisine brought one Diné chef to tears — 8/29/2023

The Grand Canyon is struggling to control its buffalo population. Tribes are stepping up to help — 10/16/2023

These Native chefs see a future for tribal agritourism in Arizona, brimming with untapped potential — 12/6/2023

Judge’s comments: The writer displays remarkable skill in showing people and their characters. 

In “Indigenous cookbook,” the opening does a great job previewing some of the contents of the book by sharing Garcia’s story. The stories about some of the book’s subjects is really engaging. However, I found myself wondering a little bit about what’s really in the book. More engaging stories? There’s really only a couple of paragraphs that tell readers about the book.

The Grand Canyon buffalo story has an engaging scene lead. Although it’s in the third paragraph, I felt that the tribal connection was easy to miss until later in the story. That connection is ultimately explored, but I feel that it takes a while to get there.

The Native chefs also has an engaging lead. A great way to turn covering an event into something more, a trend story. Good detail. Perhaps this, and other stories, might benefit from a strong nut graf.

THIRD PLACE — Grey Moran, Civil Eats

Paraquat, the Deadliest Chemical in US Agriculture, Goes on Trial – 3/22/2023

These Farmers Recharged Groundwater by Catching Atmospheric Rivers — 4/17/2023

How Crop Insurance Prevents Some Farmers From Adapting to Climate Change — 9/20/2023

Judge’s comments: The writer does a great job of explaining difficult topics and finds good human dimension.

There is a lot of background at the beginning of the Paraquat story, and it reads a bit like a research paper — a really well written research paper, but not a story. It takes quite some time before we get to the point of the story (paragraph four). The human dimension (Wyles) also comes really late in the story, but I think that is really what makes the story more relevant. I think that would have been something to get to earlier and throughout the story, rather than as a separate section.

The groundwater story, I think, is stronger at providing that human dimension early (in the lead) and showing a real example of what it is the story is talking about. It leads to a strong nut graf. Also strong about this is that Naito is someone that the story keeps returning to, grounding the story in a real person.

The crop insurance story has a very compelling lead with human dimension and, of course, you earn the surprise/irony with all that work being, in effect, punished. After that, a good exploration of the broader issue. Again, kept up with Grotegut throughout.

HONORABLE MENTION

— Ilena Peng, Bloomberg News

Florida’s Battered Orange Growers are Cashing in on a Housing Boom – 10/16/2023

America’s Sugar Shortfall Leaves Candy -Makers Scrounging — 12/16/2023

Worst of the Cocoa Rally is Yet to Come for Chocolate Makers — 12/27/2023

Judge’s comments: Good explanations of topics for these audiences.

The Florida orange entry is a good trend story that covers a lot of the causes behind the trend well. One thing that was missing was a sense of consistent human dimension. Early in the story, there is a person (Murphy), but he is dropped and we never hear from him again. I think having a real person to be able to return to throughout the story would provide some grounding for the piece.

The sugar shortfall story is a good explanation, particularly for the audience. There was, to me, a lack of human dimension. We hear from a company executive early on, and that is good for this target audience. But I didn’t see a whole lot of people after — including consumers (which, I suspect, isn’t exactly what Bloomberg readers are concerned about).

The cocoa story offers a very good explanation of the topic that is probably something that the audience wants. I did find that human dimension was lacking. We hear from experts, but it isn’t until the last part that we hear from someone affected.